0

Obama wants more background checks on guns. SO WHAT?

Is it me?


ISN’T A BACKGROUND CHECK ALREADY REQUIRED ON HAND GUNS,
NO MATTER THE SALES SOURCE?


These are plenty of choices for me... but that's just my opinion.

These are plenty of choices for me… but that’s just my opinion.

Perhaps it takes a bigger brain than mine to get this:

Even if you buy from a private party I thought the seller was responsible to take the gun into a shop with the buyer and put them through the paces, otherwise the seller still holds liability for the gun? (I was!  Or I was told by the police that I was, anyway, when I called to ask about the rules for privately selling my gun.)

Regardless, I’m missing why a background check for every gun sale would not be useful?  I know criminals will still get their mitts on guns, but frankly, I could easier live with the idea that some of the kooky-thinking, criminal-minded and slimy law breaker types I’ve known won’t EASILY get a gun and impulsively become stupid with a gun they’re power-tripping over, for whatever reason.

It just cuts down the odds of needless problems.

And with all the terrorist connections to gun use now I think it’s going to become more important not to make those few mistakes that COULD have been caught before another and another tragedy occurred.

And it just seems so easy.  AND I’M TOTALLY PRO-GUN.  But don’t mind this enough to object in any way!


What do you think?

–LAY IT ON ME, BIGGER BRAINS–


A.C. Armstrong

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*